East Orange Lumber Co. v. Feigenspan10 A.2d 732 N.J.1940Check TreatmentCheck Treatment *128 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague JJ. 12. For reversal —None.
