4,250 | Mich. Ct. App. | Jun 10, 1968

11 Mich. App. 659" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1968-06-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/earp-v-city-of-detroit-2210868?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2210868">11 Mich. App. 659 (1968)
162 N.W.2d 120" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1968-06-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/earp-v-city-of-detroit-2210868?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2210868">162 N.W.2d 120

EARP
v.
CITY OF DETROIT.

Docket No. 4,250.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided June 10, 1968.

Kelly, Greenstein & McCann, for plaintiff.

Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy (A.H. Williams and John L. Vanker, of counsel), and Alan R. Waterstone, for Michigan Bell Telephone Company.

*660 PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the order of the trial court granting defendant Michigan Bell Telephone Company's motion for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1). This is not a final judgment appealable as of right for the reason that GCR 1963, 518.2 was not complied with. This Court is without jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed. Fox v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan (1965), 375 Mich. 238" court="Mich." date_filed="1965-04-09" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/fox-v-board-of-regents-of-university-of-mich-1690094?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1690094">375 Mich 238; and Standard Building Products Company v. Woodland Building Company (1965), 1 Mich. App. 434" court="Mich. Ct. App." date_filed="1965-09-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/standard-building-products-co-v-woodland-building-co-6636390?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6636390">1 Mich App 434, 437.

QUINN, P.J., and FITZGERALD and J.H. GILLIS, JJ., concurred.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.