History
  • No items yet
midpage
Earle v. Art Library Pub. Co.
95 F. 544
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1899
Check Treatment
McPHERSON, District Judge.

I have considered carefully the reports, arguments, and testimony in this case, and am of opinion that the exceptions of Mr. McCartney, as administrator of William M. Singerly, must he overruled. I agree entirely with the learned master’s findings of fact, with the inferences of fact that he draws therefrom, and with his conclusions of law. It would he superfluous to restate what he has already put so convincingly, and accordingly I shall content myself with adopting his reports as the opinion of the court. The exceptions are dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Earle v. Art Library Pub. Co.
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 30, 1899
Citation: 95 F. 544
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.