121 Ala. 346 | Ala. | 1898
— There is but one question presented for review, viz., was there such service made upon the defendant as to authorize the judgment rendered against it? The case is presented by appeal on the record alone.
The complaint as amended reads as follows: “Fannie E. Bedden, plaintiff, v. Eagle Life Association of West-field, Massachusetts, defendant. The plaintiff claims of the defendant, a corporation, one thousand dollars ($1,000) due on a policy, whereby the defendant, on the 4th day of May, 1896, insured for the term of his natural life, the life of T. J. Bedden, who died on the 17th day of June, 1897, of which the defendant had notice. Said policy is the property of the plaintiff.”
The Code, section 3274 (2657) provides, “When the suit is against a corporation, the summons may be executed by the delivery of a copy of the summons and complaint to the president or other head thereof, secretary, cashier, station agent, or any other agent thereof.” There is nothing in this statute which excludes foreign corporations from its provisions, and by its. terms, foreign as well as domestic corporations are excluded. It is true, other sections of the Code make special provisions for service on corporations doing business in this State when they are sued, but these several provisions are cumulative, for the greater convenience of those who desire to institute legal proceedings against such corporations. To hold otherwise, would be by judicial construction, to render nugatory said section 3274 (2657) of the Code which we have quoted above.
A judgment by default was entered in this case, and a writ of inquiry was executed. The service as to the return of the sheriff, showed that the summons and complaint were “executed by handing a copy to Bobert Cox.!’
We discover no reversible error in the judgment below, and it is affirmed.
Affirmed.
