History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eachus v. Hartwell
112 F. 564
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1901
Check Treatment
ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The amount of the assessment in question in this suit being less than $2,000, the bill must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. U. S. v. Sayward, 160 U. S. 497, 16 Sup. Ct. 371, 40 L. Ed. 508; Fishback v. Telegraph Co., 161 U. S. 100, 16 Sup. Ct. 506, 40 L. Ed. 630; Transfer Co. v. Pendergrass, 16 C. C. A. 585, 70 Fed. 1; Wheless v. City of St. Rouis (C. C.) 96 Fed. 865. There is nothing tó the contrary in the case of Woodside v. Ciceroni, 35 C. C. A. 177, 93 Fed. 1, where it was held that in a suit to quiet title, or to remove a cloud therefrom, it is not the value of the defendant’s claim which is the amount of the controversy, but the whole of the real estate to which the claim extends.

Injunction denied, and demurrer sustained, and bill dismissed, at •complainant’s cost.

Case Details

Case Name: Eachus v. Hartwell
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
Date Published: Dec 30, 1901
Citation: 112 F. 564
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.