OPINION OF THE COURT
In this cause of action for medical malpractice, Supreme
In addressing a similar issue in Tewari v Tsoutsouras (
Subsequently, in Kolb v Strogh (
We agree that a failure to comply with CPLR 3012-a is analogous to noncompliance with CPLR 3406 (a) and that the sanction of dismissal is therefore unwarranted. Consequently, to the extent that our prior decisions in Smith v McDaniel (
Supreme Court, therefore, properly exercised its discretion to extend for 30 days the time to file the CPLR 3012-a certificate (CPLR 2004). The sanction of dismissal is, of course, still available should plaintiff fail to comply with Supreme Court’s order.
Accordingly, the order should be affirmed.
Boomer, J. P., Pine, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ., concur.
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
