midpage

Dycus v. StateDycus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 17, 1993
No. 93-00509
Versions:629 So. 2d 275
1993 WL 523854
1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12338
THREADGILL, Judge.

The trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion to suppress evidence; therefore, we affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. However, we strike special conditions of probation numbers (4) and (7) because they were not orally announced at sentencing and the appellant had no opportunity to object to their *276imposition. See Gregory v. State, 616 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Dycus v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 17, 1993
Citations: 629 So. 2d 275; 1993 WL 523854; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12338; No. 93-00509
Docket Number: No. 93-00509
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In