History
  • No items yet
midpage
Durrant v. Hale
168 U.S. 705
SCOTUS
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Einal order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516; Nordstrom v. Washington, 164 U. S. 705; Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124.

Case Details

Case Name: Durrant v. Hale
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 8, 1897
Citation: 168 U.S. 705
Docket Number: No. 429
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.