History
  • No items yet
midpage
Durning v. Hastings
183 Pa. 210
Pa.
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

This record contains nothing that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications of error. The case was ably and correctly tried. It was clearly for the jury on the questions of fact presented by the evidence, and was submitted to them with full and adequate instructions, of which the defendant has no just reason to complain.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Durning v. Hastings
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 8, 1897
Citation: 183 Pa. 210
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 62
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.