History
  • No items yet
midpage
Durgin v. Baker
32 Me. 273
Me.
1850
Check Treatment
Howard, J.,

orally.—The contract reserves to each of the parties the largest liberty.. Neither could control the other. Either might terminate the contract at pleasure. It was not .requisite that he should have a reason for it. He cannot, therefore, be required to prove one.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Durgin v. Baker
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1850
Citation: 32 Me. 273
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.