midpage

Durell v. MosherDurell v. Mosher

New York Supreme Court
Oct 15, 1811
Versions:
Per Curiam.

The objection to the jurors was unfounded. The third juror objected to, had given no decided opinion on the merits of the cause. His declaration was hypothetical. Though a demand and refusal of, the sheep was not proved; yet the promise by the defendant to return them, and a failure to do so, was evidence of a conversion. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Durell v. Mosher
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1811
Citation: 8 Johns. 445
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Log In