History
  • No items yet
midpage
Durden v. Moore
159 S.E. 135
Ga. Ct. App.
1931
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

The exception here is to the first grant of a new trial. The verdict was not demanded by the law and the facts of the case; and therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the judgment must be

Affirmed. Lulce, J., concurs.

Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Case Details

Case Name: Durden v. Moore
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 9, 1931
Citation: 159 S.E. 135
Docket Number: 21455
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.