375 Mich. 665 | Mich. | 1965
Lead Opinion
In his opinion this day handed down in Durant v. Stahlin (Van Dusen, Elliott, Romney), 375 Mich 628, Mr. Justice Adams has written that the appeal therein is another aspect of matters dealt with in Durant v. Stahlin, 374 Mich 82, and Zimmerman v. Stahlin, 374 Mich 93. That is also true of this appeal.
The record in the instant case discloses that defendant Brucker filed an answer to plaintiff’s amend
Concurrence Opinion
(concurring). I concur in affirmance. See my opinion in Durant v. Stahlin (Appeal in re Van Dusen, Elliott, Romney), 375 Mich 628, 640, also decided this day.