22515 | S.C. | Mar 31, 1986

Gregory, Justice:

Respondent commenced this action to set aside several *313deeds alleging mistake in conveyances to a trust.1 Appellants moved for the case to be transferred to the jury roster. This appeal is from the denial of that motion. We affirm.

In an action to set aside a deed, a party’s right to a jury trial is determined by whether the dispute raises legal or equitable issues. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Crouch, 189 S. C. 57, 200 S.E. 356" court="S.C." date_filed="1938-12-14" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/union-central-life-ins-co-v-crouch-3883938?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3883938">200 S. E. 356 (1938). Respondent’s complaint, although poorly drafted, raises a simple question — whether respondent was mistaken in his conveyances to the trust. This Court, through long-established precedent, has recognized that an action alleging mistake is in equity. See Turner v. Washington Realty Co., 128 S. C. 271, 122 S.E. 768" court="S.C." date_filed="1924-05-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/turner-v-washington-realty-co-3879770?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3879770">122 S. E. 768 (1924).2 Therefore, the trial judge properly denied appellants’ motion.

Affirmed.

Ness, C. J., and Harwell, Chandler and Finney, JJ., concur.

The complaint was drawn with three causes of action; however, all three essentially allege mistake in the conveyances.

Turner addressed the propriety of relief in an action based on mistake; however, it is clear that resolution of the issue in that case was dependent on a preliminary finding that the action was in equity.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.