History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duperier v. State
568 So. 2d 976
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1990
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. The appellant moved to suppress physical evidence prior to trial, but he failed to object when it was introduced at trial. Thus, he has waived his right to appellate review. Baglio v. State, 467 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Deluca v. State, 384 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). For a comprehensive discussion of this issue, see Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927).

*977We find no error in the remaining points raised.

LETTS, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Duperier v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 10, 1990
Citation: 568 So. 2d 976
Docket Number: No. 89-1306
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.