midpage

Dunn v. . TaylorDunn v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 12, 1924
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Stacy
Stacy, J.

The December Term of court ended in Kinston when the judge left ‍‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‍the bench for the term, although no notice was given of the final adjournment, and it was understood that the term of court should ‍‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‍expire by limitation. Delafield v. Const. Co., 115 N. C., 21; Branch v. Walker, 92 N. C., 87. His Honor, therefore, was without authority to enter the order, signed ‍‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‍at his home in Clinton, canceling or vacating the judgment previously rendered by him at term. The plaintiff’s exception to this order must be ‍‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‍sustained; but this will be done without prejudice to the rights of the defendant to assail the judgment rendered at the December term, or ‍‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‍to have it vacated by motion in the cause or other appropriate remedy.

Error.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunn v. . Taylor
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 12, 1924
Citations: 187 N.C. 385; 121 S.E. 659; 1924 N.C. LEXIS 293
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In