History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunn v. Smith
117 Ohio St. 3d 1438
Ohio
2008
Check Treatment

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Andrew Dunn.

Sua sponte, the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903; Hernandez v. Kelly, 107 Ohio St.3d 1430, 2005-Ohio-6400, 838 N.E.2d 670.

Respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court will not be required.

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunn v. Smith
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 26, 2008
Citation: 117 Ohio St. 3d 1438
Docket Number: 2008-0425
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.