History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunn v. Ohio
51 S. Ct. 84
SCOTUS
1930
Check Treatment
Per Curiam: Messrs. Rufus S. Day and W. E. Minshall for appellant. Messrs. Gilbert Beitman, Frank R. Hubachek, Henry 8. Brainard, and Alfred Clum for respondent.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U. S. 563; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 233; Morgan v. Georgia, 281 U. S. 691. The petition for a writ of certiorari in this cause is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunn v. Ohio
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 27, 1930
Citation: 51 S. Ct. 84
Docket Number: No. 443
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.