delivered the opinion of the court:
William H. Dunn, the complainant in the court below, filed a bill in the circuit court of Cook county against the Addison Manual Training School for Boys, the county clerk and the county treasurer of Cook county, praying that an injunction be issued restraining said clerk and treasurer from paying any money to the school for clothing, tuition or the care and maintenance of the boys committed to said school by the courts of the State, upon the ground that the payment of such moneys would violate section 3 of article 8 of the constitution. The bill was answered by the officials of the school, the county clerk and the treasurer, and the school also filed a cross-bill, setting out substantially the same facts that were set out in its answer, and denying that the paying of this money was in any way in conflict with said section of the constitution. The court entered an order dismissing the original bill for want of equity, and finding also that the sum asked for by said school be paid, and enjoining the complainant from bringing any action at law or in equity to interfere with the county board, the county treasurer, the county clerk or the school in the matter of paying or collecting in the future such sums as may become due for the care of children committed to the school. The county treasurer has brought the case here on appeal.
The case was tried largely on a stipulation of facts. The stipulation stated, in substance, that neither Cook county nor the State had provided any manual training school for boys, nor any other facilities to provide and care for the boys under the charge and control of the school; that it would require several hundred thousand dollars to provide suitable buildings and grounds to properly house and care for the boys committed there; that forty-six boys now in the school were legally committed by courts of record substantially in all respects as shown by the record in one typical case of the juvenile court which was introduced in evidence.
The bill is similar in all of its material allegations to the bill filed in Dunn v. Chicago Industrial School for Girls,
On the above facts it must be held that under the reasoning of this court in Dunn v. Chicago Industrial School for Girls, supra, the payment of this money by Cook county to this school for the care of these boys is not in contravention of section 3 of article 8 of the constitution. The reasons are set out at length in that decision and need not be repeated here.
The decree of the circuit court will be affirmed.
Decree affirmed.
