History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunham v. Kauffman
1916 U.S. LEXIS 1389
SCOTUS
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (2) The Pennsylvania College Cases, 13 Wall. 190; Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U. S. 561; Missouri Pacific Ry. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 274-275. (3) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunham v. Kauffman
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 22, 1916
Citation: 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1389
Docket Number: No. 189
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.