History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunham v. Gillis
8 Mass. 462
Mass.
1812
Check Treatment
By the Court.

This point is settled by the case of Tippet vs. Hawkey, (3) which was not cited in the argument. Here the consideration was several. The parties contributed severally and in different proportions to the joint stock. Their covenants were several, and each has his several remedy for a breach. The admission of the indenture in evidence at the trial was therefore Draper.

Let judgment he entered on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunham v. Gillis
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1812
Citation: 8 Mass. 462
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.