History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunham v. Chamberlain
9 Johns. 224
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1812
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

A justice’s court has no jurisdiction of matters of account, “ where the sum total of the accounts of both parties shall, in the whole, amount to 200 dollars.” Here the accounts of both parties, proved to the satisfaction of the referees, exceeded, in the whole, 200 dollars. It was, therefore, clearly a case in which a justice had no jurisdiction, and the plaintiff was obliged to sue in the common pleas. And in all suits in the common pleas, where “ the accounts between the parties exceed 200 dollars, to be certified, &c. if by reason of payment, or discount, the plaintiff shall recover less than 25 dolars, he shall recover costs,” &c(Laws N. Y. v. 1. p. 530.) The certificate of the referees was, here, a substitute for the certificate of the judge, upon the trial, and the plaintiff is entitled to costs.

Judgment for the plaintiff

Case Details

Case Name: Dunham v. Chamberlain
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1812
Citation: 9 Johns. 224
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.