History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunham v. Cades
115 N.J. Eq. 290
N.J.
1934
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Yice-Chancellor Davis, in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Hehee, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Paekee, J. 1.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunham v. Cades
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 2, 1934
Citation: 115 N.J. Eq. 290
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.