History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duneske v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
4:23-cv-11778
E.D. Mich.
Apr 17, 2024
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 4:23-cv-11778-FKB-APP ECF No. 9, PageID.21 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LINDSAY ANN DUNESKE, Case No. 23 ‐ 11778

Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,

et al. ,

Defendants.

___________________________ /

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiff Lindsay Ann Duneske filed both a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on July 21, 2023. (ECF No. 1, 2). On February 5, 2024, the court entered an Order requiring Plaintiff to file an amended IFP application to correct several deficiencies, including that: (1) the application was unsigned; (2) the application failed to include a supplemental explanation to her answer to question nine, as is explicitly required; and (3) the application listed the full names of her minor children. (ECF No. 7). The court’s Order also notified Plaintiff that failure to submit a corrected IFP application by the deadline would result in its denial. Id. , PageID.18. Plaintiff failed to file a corrected IFP application by the deadline and, as a result, the court entered an Order on March

1

Case 4:23-cv-11778-FKB-APP ECF No. 9, PageID.22 Filed 04/17/24 Page 2 of 2 5, 2024 denying her application and directing her to pay the $405.00 filing fee by April 5, 2024. (ECF No. 8). This Order further warned Plaintiff that “[f]ailure to pay the filing fee by this deadline may result in dismissal of the complaint.” Id. , PageID.19.

“Federal courts possess certain ‘inherent powers…to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.’” Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger , 581 U.S. 101 (2017) (quoting Link v. Wabash R.R. , 370 U.S. 626, 630 ‐ 31 (1962)). Plaintiff’s failure to either file an amended IFP application or pay the required filing fee warrants dismissal of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. See Jourdan v. Jabe , 951 F.2d 108, 109 (6th Cir. 1991) (“Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) recognizes the power of the district court to enter a sua sponte order of dismissal.”). As such, the court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice.

SO ORDERED .

Date: April 17, 2024 s/ F. Kay Behm

F. Kay Behm United States District Judge 2

Case Details

Case Name: Duneske v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Date Published: Apr 17, 2024
Docket Number: 4:23-cv-11778
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.