History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dunbar v. Sweeney
184 A.D. 925
N.Y. App. Div.
1918
Check Treatment

Judgment modified by striking out the provisions requiring the defendants to raise the bottom of their reservoir and conduit to the level of the bottom of the plaintiff’s spring and enjoining the defendants from again lowering the bottoms of said reservoir and conduit; also the provision enjoining the defendants from using the water of such spring for purposes permitted by such judgment to an extent so that it shall lower *926the water of plaintiff’s spring so that it cannot be drawn through the outlet that existed just prior to the time plaintiff lowered such outlet to the bottom of said spring after defendants constructed their reservoir; and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concurred, except Lambert and Merrell, JJ., who dissented and voted for reversal and dismissal of the complaint.

Case Details

Case Name: Dunbar v. Sweeney
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1918
Citation: 184 A.D. 925
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.