History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dumpson v. Cohen
14 A.D.2d 871
N.Y. App. Div.
1961
Check Treatment

It appears from the record that said sum would be payable by defendant attorney to his client, Thelma Weiner, over and above his fees and liens. The assignment by Thelma Weiner to the plaintiff is absolute and complete. It is enforcible by the plaintiff as real party in interest (see Personal Property Law, § 41; Gellens v. 11 W. 42nd St., 259 App. Div. 435; Wagner v. Braunsberg, 5 A D 2d 564), and the assignor need not be joined as a party to the action (see Gleason v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co., 203 N. Y. 507; Segal Lock & Hardware Co. v. Markey, 124 N. Y. S. 2d 181; 2 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 542). Concur—McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Dumpson v. Cohen
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 30, 1961
Citation: 14 A.D.2d 871
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.