History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dumas v. Hunter
28 Ala. 688
Ala.
1856
Check Treatment
RICE, C. J.

The judgment of the court below was in favor of the appellee, and against the appellant and Jemes M. Cochran. The appeal bond misdescribes this judgment, and describes a judgment against the appellant only. If that bond does not support the appeal, there is nothing else to sustain it. That bond does not support the appeal, because the misdescription of the judgment is fatal. — Satterwhite v. The State, at the present term, and the authorities therein cited.’

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: Dumas v. Hunter
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1856
Citation: 28 Ala. 688
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.