History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dultz v. Fischlowitz
104 N.Y.S. 357
N.Y. App. Term.
1907
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by an infant, who at the time of the accident was five years of age. The infant was knocked down by an automobile of the defendant while he was.crossing from the south to the north side of West Thirty-Fifth street, on the west side of Seventh avenue. The child left his father’s place of business on Seventh avenue, between Thirty-Third and Thirty-Fourth streets, to go to a bakery on the same avenue, between Thirty-Fifth and Thirty-Sixth streets, to purchase some cake. The testimony of the father of the child was that before the child left his store he cautioned him to look out for cars, automobiles, and wagons. The testimony showed that the automobile was going rapidly, and that no signal of its approach was given. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the defendant was called to the stand, but was asked no questions and gave no testimony. The justice who tried the case without a jury then granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The facts testified to by the witnesses for the plaintiff were uncontradicted and established a prima facie case. The judgment dismissing the complaint was contrary to the weight of the evidence,- and should be reversed.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case Details

Case Name: Dultz v. Fischlowitz
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: May 16, 1907
Citation: 104 N.Y.S. 357
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.