History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dukes v. State
808 So. 2d 276
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2002
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the constitutionality of section 775.087(2)-(7), Florida Statutes (1999), the 10/20/Life statute, on the basis that the statute violates the separation of powers provision and the single subject requirement in the Florida Constitution. We affirm.

This Court has previously rejected separation of powers challenges to the 10/20/ Life statute. See Hagan v. State, 793 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Green v. State, 792 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We do not reach the merits of the appellant’s single subject claim as he failed to preserve the issue for appellate review. See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Dukes v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 1, 2002
Citation: 808 So. 2d 276
Docket Number: No. 1D00-4026
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.