History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duhamel v. Texas
480 U.S. 926
SCOTUS
1987
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. Ohio;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. Mo.; and

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certio-rari denied.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Case Details

Case Name: Duhamel v. Texas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 9, 1987
Citation: 480 U.S. 926
Docket Number: No. 86-6082; No. 86-6101; No. 86-6129; No. 86-6171; No. 86-6201
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.