History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dugger v. Harris
110 S. Ct. 573
SCOTUS
1989
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.






Concurrence Opinion

Justice Brennan,

concurring.

I agree that respondent’s lawyers rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, see Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976) (dissenting opinion), I would hold that the State is precluded on remand from imposing a sentence of death.

Case Details

Case Name: Dugger v. Harris
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 11, 1989
Citation: 110 S. Ct. 573
Docket Number: No. 89-650
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.