Dugger v. Harris, 493 U.S. 1011

Lead Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

---

Concurrence Opinion

Justice Brennan,

concurring.

I agree that respondent’s lawyers rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, see Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976) (dissenting opinion), I would hold that the State is precluded on remand from imposing a sentence of death.

Case Details

Case Name: Dugger v. Harris

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Dec 11, 1989

Citations: 493 U.S. 1011; 110 S. Ct. 573; No. 89-650

Docket Number: No. 89-650

Court Abbreviation: U.S.