Dufour v. Seymour

280 P. 134 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1929

THE COURT.

[1] The testimony in the above-entitled matter seems to present a substantial conflict upon the question of whether or not the petitioner was injured in the course of his employment; and in that state of the record the finding of the respondent commission is controlling. The application for the writ is, therefore, denied upon that ground.