History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dufour v. Seymour
100 Cal. App. 434
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

[1] The testimony in the above-entitled matter seems to present a substantial conflict upon the question of whether or not the petitioner was injured in the course of his employment; and in that state of the record the finding of the respondent commission is controlling. The application for the writ is, therefore, denied upon that ground. *Page 435

Case Details

Case Name: Dufour v. Seymour
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Aug 24, 1929
Citation: 100 Cal. App. 434
Docket Number: Docket No. 7004.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.