Duffy v. Hargan
63 N.J. Eq. 802
N.J.
1902
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 588.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vooritees, Vroom —15. For reversal—None.