History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duffer v. State
115 Tex. Crim. 518
Tex. Crim. App.
1930
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The indictment charged in one count that Walter Duffer, Fuller Duffer and Sylvester Sanders sold intoxicating liquor to Ennis Fort, and in another count that the three parties named possessed intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. The *Page 519 parties were tried jointly and all convicted under the count last named and each was assessed a punishment of one year in the penitentiary. Separate verdicts were returned and separate judgments entered and the cases reach this court under separate records as though there had been separate trials, but with identical transcripts and statements of facts.

The evidence has been rather fully set out in the opinion in No. 13,155, Walter Duffer v. State, this day decided, and it is unnecessary to repeat it here. It was stated in that opinion what disposition should be made of the present case. Reference is made to that opinion for the reasons upon which an affirmance of the judgment in the present case is based.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.






Addendum

The record has been re-examined in the light of the appellant's motion for rehearing. For the reasons stated in the opinion on motion for rehearing in the companion case of Walter Duffer v. State, No. 13,155, the motion in the present appeal is also overruled.

Overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Duffer v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 26, 1930
Citation: 115 Tex. Crim. 518
Docket Number: No. 13157.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.