History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duffel v. State
116 Ga. 92
Ga.
1902
Check Treatment
Little, J.

There being no error of law complained of, and the evidence, although entirely circumstantial, being sufficient to warrant the verdict, the judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Duffel v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 7, 1902
Citation: 116 Ga. 92
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In