History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dudley v. McKenzie
54 Vt. 394
Vt.
1882
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Yeazey, J.

Section 3980, of the Revised Laws, reads as follows:

“ If a person so impounding a beast does not give such notice he shall forfeit to such owner or keeper fifty cents for every twenty-four hours’ neglect to do so, and shall pay the damage which,” &c.

Under this provision the forfeiture would be no more in the case of several beasts found in one’s enclosure and impounded at *395the same time, than in the case of one beast. It is a penalty for the neglect in each instance of impounding, not for each beast impounded at one time. In this case the forfeiture is fifty cents for every twenty-four hours’ neglect to give the notice of the impounding of the eighty sheep, not fifty cents for each one of the eighty.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Dudley v. McKenzie
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Feb 15, 1882
Citation: 54 Vt. 394
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.