History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duckett v. State
257 Ala. 589
Ala.
1952
Check Treatment

Petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review the judgment and opinion of that court in Duckett v. State,60 So.2d 357.

The petition is not on transcript paper, as required by Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix, and we have no alternative but to strike it. So ordered. Stovall v. Stovall, Ala.Sup., 57 So.2d 641;1 Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham,255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1,36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State,248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30. See Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280,110 So. 409.

Petition stricken.

FOSTER, LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

1 Ante, p. 124.
*Page 590

Case Details

Case Name: Duckett v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Aug 27, 1952
Citation: 257 Ala. 589
Docket Number: 8 Div. 658
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.