History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duchess v. Langston Corp.
556 Pa. 435
Pa.
1999
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7 th day of May, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issue:

Did the Superior Court err in reversing judgment in favor of Petitioner finding that evidence of a subsequent design change was admissible as a subsequent repair as opposed to a subsequent remedial measure?

Case Details

Case Name: Duchess v. Langston Corp.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 7, 1999
Citation: 556 Pa. 435
Docket Number: Petition No. 410 W.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.