History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dubuisson v. A.I.S., Inc. of Massachusetts
2:16-cv-03640
E.D. La.
May 10, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RICHARD DUBUISSON CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-3640 A.I.S., INC. OF MASSACHUSETTS SECTION "N" (3)

ORDER AND REASONS

Presently before the Court is the motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 15) filed by Defendant A.I.S., Inc. of Massachusetts ("A.I.S.") relative to Plaintiff Richard Dubuisson's alleged "seaman status" for purpose of his Jones Act and maintenance and cure claims. Because the Court has granted, by separate order, Defendant's motion addressed to the evidentiary sufficiency of Plaintiff's Jones Act negligence and unseaworthiness claims (Rec. Doc. 14), it is the Court's understanding that only Plantiff's maintenance and cure claims remain at issue in this litigation.

Having carefully considered the parties' competing submissions and applicable law, the Court finds that Defendant's motion must be denied. To prove seaman status, a plaintiff must show that: (1) his duties contributed to the function of the vessel or the accomplishment of its mission; and (2) he has a connection to a vessel in navigation or to an identifiable group of such vessels that is substantial in terms of both its duration and nature. See, e.g., Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347, 368 (1995). As a general rule, "a worker who spend less than about 30 percent of his time in service of a vessel in navigation should not qualify as a seaman." Id. at 371. Given that Plaintiff undisputedly spent 31% of the time aboard Captain Tolbert's vessel during the August 17 - *2 December 1, 2015 oyster sampling project, and Defendant's acknowledgement that Plaintiff's duties contributed to accomplishment of the vessel's mission, the Court, on the instant showing made, is not in a position to conclude that Plaintiff lacks seaman status as a matter of law. Rather, that question appears to be appropriately left to the trier-of-fact, the jury, for determination. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment directed at seaman status (Rec. Doc. 15) is DENIED .

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 10th day of May 2017. _____________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge Clerk to Copy:

Magistrate Judge Knowles

2

Case Details

Case Name: Dubuisson v. A.I.S., Inc. of Massachusetts
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Date Published: May 10, 2017
Docket Number: 2:16-cv-03640
Court Abbreviation: E.D. La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.