Drummett v. State, 328 So. 2d 457

Drummett v. State

328 So. 2d 457

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1976

Check Treatment

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress his statements in that they were clearly induced by improper promises of a police officer. Appellant’s other points are without merit. We reverse and remand upon authority of Jarriel v. State, 317 So.2d 141 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975) and M. D. B. v. State, 311 So.2d 399 (Fla.App. 4th 1975).

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.