History
  • No items yet
midpage
Druke v. Heiken
1882 Cal. LEXIS 613
Cal.
1882
Check Treatment
The Court :

If a promissory note payable to order and not indorsed, is the subject of a gift, causa mortis, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, for there is uncontradicted evidence that such a note was given by the decedent as a donatio causa mortis to Margaret Heiken, one of the defendants in this action. The authorities cited by respondent’s counsel are somewhat numerous, and all support their contention “ that a promissory note payable to order and not indorsed, is the subject of a gift causa mortis.”

Section 3101 of the Civil Code has not changed the rule in regard to the transfer of negotiable instruments payable to order by indorsement. The assignment of the note carried the mortgage with it.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Druke v. Heiken
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 28, 1882
Citation: 1882 Cal. LEXIS 613
Docket Number: No. 8,259
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.