8 How. Pr. 56 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1853
The supplemental answer under the Code is a substitute for the old plea puis darrien continuance; but it differs from that plea in this respect; that the supplemental answer may be allowed on motion, whenever the facts forming the ground of the answer, have occurred since the answer was put in, or where the defendant was ignorant of .them at the time of pleading the first answer; whereas the plea puis darrien, could strictly be pleaded only before or at the next continuance, after the facts transpired (see § 177 of the Code, and Gra. Pr. 256). Where the facts asked to be incorporated and pleaded in a supplemental answer, go to divest the plaintiff of the right to maintain the action; and transfer the cause of action to another, who has received satisfaction for the demand involved in it, it is the duty of the court to grant the motion. The word may in such a case, means must; and it will make no difference, whether the' motion be made at the earliest day or not. The facts amount to an entire satisfaction of the cause of action, and whenever pleaded and established, they utterly extinguish the plaintiff’s right to prosecute it.
The only material question, therefore, to be decided, would seem to be whether the facts stated in the affidavit amount to a .defence, that' puts an end to the .cause of action of the plaintiff. It is not denied that, whatever chose in action would pass to a receiver appointed in a creditor’s bill, would also pass to a receiver appointed under an order made in proceedings supplémentary to an execution under the Code. In truth those pro