History
  • No items yet
midpage
Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway
1902 N.H. LEXIS 93
| N.H. | 1902
|
Check Treatment

The defendants do not contend that the courts of this state cannot entertain jurisdiction of the action, but say it is within their discretion whether they will do so or not. If so, the question is one of fact rather than of law, and should be decided in the superior court.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Mar 7, 1902
Citation: 1902 N.H. LEXIS 93
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.