History
  • No items yet
midpage
Driggs v. Wolfe
50 N.J. Eq. 795
N.J.
1893
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.-

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Depue, Lippincott,. Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Clement,. Smith—10.

For reversal—Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: Driggs v. Wolfe
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 15, 1893
Citation: 50 N.J. Eq. 795
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.