Dreyfus v. Lutz Co.
106 N.J.L. 566
N.J.
1929
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. '

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Paekee, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.