History
  • No items yet
midpage
Drexler v. Cohen
108 N.Y.S. 680
N.Y. App. Term.
1908
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This action is between the same parties as calendar No. 110 (108 N. Y. Supp. 679) and is brought to recover rent for the same premises referred to in that action from October 1, 1906, to October 1, 1907. The first action was commenced in October, 1907, at which time the rent sued for in this second action had accrued. The pendency of the former action was set up by oral pleading. Defendant’s counsel moved to dismiss the complaint. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiffs.

An action for rent on a lease may be brought for each installment of rent as it falls due; but it must embrace all the installments due at the commencement of the action, and the claim for several installments of rent due under the same lease and all due at the time of the suit constitutes an indivisible cause of action. When several actions are brought thereon, the pendency of one action is a good defense in the others. The complaint should have been dismissed.

Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Drexler v. Cohen
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Feb 7, 1908
Citation: 108 N.Y.S. 680
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.