History
  • No items yet
midpage
Drew v. State Liquor Authority
2 N.Y.2d 624
NY
1957
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

If, in connection with appellants’ petition for a transfer of their liquor store and the subsequent proceeding, there was irregularity in vital matters, illegality or conduct tantamount to fraud, then, the principle of administrative *628finality may not here be invoked or applied. On the other hand, if no snch irregularity, illegality or fraud were present, the State Liquor Authority lacked power to reverse its original determination approving the application. Consequently, under the circumstances of this cáse, we refrain from considering the decisive effect of the Authority’s initial determination, as well as the problem of administrative finality, until after the hearing, directed by the Appellate Division, shall have been held.

The order should be affirmed.

Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Drew v. State Liquor Authority
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 12, 1957
Citation: 2 N.Y.2d 624
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.