65 Pa. Commw. 641 | Pa. Commw. Ct. | 1982
Opinion by
The petitioner, Robert Drayton, argues that the findings of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) do not support its order denying him benefits because of his discharge for willful misconduct.
Even were we to accept all of the petitioner’s arguments as valid, we would still find it necessary to affirm the Board. The findings of fact which are clearly supported by the record establish that the petitioner had a history of absenteeism, that he had been advised by his doctor not to consume alcoholic beverages and that he appeared at his place of work, on a day when he was supposed to be ill,
We will affirm the order of the Board.
Order
And Now, this 6th day of April, 1982, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.
Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43P.S. §802(e).
As the Board found the petitioner went to his employer’s establishment in order to pick up his paycheck,