Drake v. Byram
100 N.J. Eq. 343 | N.J. | 1926
The decree under review will he affirmed, for the reasons given in the conclusions of Vice-Chancellor Pielder.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiep-Justice, -Tbenchabd, Paeiceb, Mintuen, Kalisoi-i, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gabdnek, Van Buskibk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — Hone.