34 S.C. 464 | S.C. | 1891
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This was an action to recover a balance alleged to be duo plaintiff under a. written contract with t.he defendant company for the delivery of a large number of railroad cross-ties, according to certain specifications contained in the contract. The plaintiff having recovered a verdict for six hundred dollars, the defendant moved for a new trial on the minutes, which being refused, judgment was entered on the verdict, from which defendant appeals upon the several grounds set out in the record.
The second ground of appeal does not correctly represent the charge of the Circuit Judge, and for this reason, if there were no
The judgment of this court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.